AVOGADRO’S HYPOTHESIS DEBUNKED
Dr. Maxwell Nartey, Professor of Symptometric Science
American School of Symptometry
When people attempt to discredit the effectiveness of homoeopathic remedies and of any health practice that uses them, they refer to Avogadro’s Hypothesis. This is incorrect and can no longer be the case.
Count Amadeo Avogadro used mathematics to estimate how much of the active ingredient would be left in a mother tincture after diluting it several times (serial dilution). He concluded that after the 12C or 24X potency, there would not be a speck of the active ingredient left in the solution. This is because the active ingredient would have been diluted out. It was his conclusion that led physicians, Dr. Hahnemann’s detractors, to believe that all the particulates in the 30th, 200th, 1M and 50M potencies were nothing but placebos or empty sugar pills devoid of an active ingredient. Is this true? No, it is not.
Let me share with the reader what the foxy Avogadro did to mislead the public. He deliberately left out succussion from his calculation. By leaving out succussion and focusing only on dilution, Avogadro succeeded in wiping out Dr. Hahnemann’s historical achievement, thus making every homoeopathic remedy questionable. No wonder that many physicians until this day do not know how particulates work. This article will, from this day forward, make a big difference in the way homoeopathy is perceived around the world.
To begin, we must acknowledge that the correct spelling of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s brainchild is homoeopathy, not homeopathy. He is the founder of homoeopathy and the way he spelt homoeopathy in 1796 must stand. Everything about homoeopathy must go back to Dr. Samuel Hahnemann, not to his disciples and homoeopathic scholars. Now for the science that makes homoeopathic products effective methods of treatment.
The dilution of the mother tincture with distilled water or with grain alcohol is automatically followed by succussion. Why did Avogadro leave out succussion which is critical to the production of a particulate (remedy)? Apparently, he had not studied physics, and he knew nothing about energy and atomic collision.
Succussion is mechanical atomization. Basically, it is the process of pounding a diluted mother tincture on a hard but soft surface. The objective is not only to produce a new potency. It is also to reduce a molecule to its atoms through atomic collision. It is the atoms in the active ingredient and its ancillaries that are colliding in a dynamic medium. Nine phenomena occur during and after an atomic collision:
- The tangents of energy are released;
- The nuclei of the atoms are exposed;
- Nuclear fusion takes place;
- Sub-atomic particles are released;
- Nuclear fission is also taking place because neutrons are bombarding atoms;
- Electrolytic dissociation is scattering atoms and it is eliminating negative energy;
- Regrouping of the atoms that have positive energy is taking place;
- Monomers are produced through reconfiguration; and
- A polymer is produced.
Therefore, succussion is the process where atomization makes a polymer replace the active ingredient and its ancillaries. In other words, all the atoms of the active ingredient and its ancillaries are still present. Is a homoeopathic particulate devoid of active ingredient? No, it is not. An active ingredient is present, but as atoms in a polymer. This is what has never been explained until now. It is powerful because there are important differences between a polymer and a molar solution.
A polymer has a positive and a negative pole. It is made of ions that are electrically charged. Its electrical currents create mild vibrations that carve out nutrient, biochemical and electrical pathways. Also, the polymer causes electrolytic dissociation and ionization because it is electrically charged.
Avogadro used mathematics to understand and explain dilution, but he did not and could not explain succussion – a process that encompasses classical, atomic and nuclear physics. Succussion is physics, not mathematics. To present his analysis of Dr. Hahnemann’s work as complete was ignorant, arrogant, and fool-hardy of this professor of mathematics.
Unfortunately, the physicians – who did not know any better in those days – applauded his work and gave maximum publicity to his hypothesis. Dr. Samuel Hahnemann was seen as an allopathic doctor’s competitor and bitter rival because of the potential loss of clients and income that could result from homoeopathy’s popularity. Therefore, anyone who could discredit his work and give physicians the upper hand became their hero. Physicians found their hero in Avogadro.
For over 200 years (1810-2017), Avogadro’s hypothesis has hung around homoeopathy’s neck like an Albatross and has even been used in attempts to discredit other forms of nonallopathic care. Homoeopaths wrote rebuttals, but – because they did not study physics – their rebuttals were weak and inconsequential. Mass spectrometry was first used to uncover polymerization during succussion at the college of pharmacy, Montpelier University, France, in 1974. Yet, still no rebuttals included such information.
I, Dr. Maxwell Nartey, studied physics and postgraduate homoeopathy. I also used Rama mass spectrometry to confirm what is in every one of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s products. This is what sets this rebuke apart from the ones that came before it.
Polymerization has now officially debunked Avogadro’s hypothesis. It has also exposed Count Amadeo Avogadro as a complete fraud, an illusionist, and a con artist. Why did he leave out succussion from his mathematical calculations? He deliberately excluded succussion because he could not explain it.
Succussion is very easy to explain. It is a real-life lesson in classical, atomic and nuclear physics. It releases all the tangents of energy which include: forces, kinetic energy, waves, electricity, heat, vibrations, speed, and momentum.
Do pharmaceutical drugs undergo polymerization? No, they do not. It is because they are in their rudimentary state that they keep their molecular structure and their ingredient.
There are two ways to treat a person. They can be treated with a molecule that contains an active ingredient, or they can be treated with a product that contains a polymer. A molecule always remains at the organ or tissue level. This is because it is too big to penetrate a cell. It is only a polymer that penetrates the human cell. Therefore, if a person wants the root of their disease to be addressed, a polymer must be used, not a molecule.
However, since natural atomization takes place in a healthy small intestine, a few botanical molecules or vitamins can be atomized so that their atoms can penetrate the cells without much electricity.
The machine that detects the presence of the active ingredient in a product cannot be used to detect the presence of a polymer; and the equipment that detects the presence of a polymer cannot be used to detect the presence of an active ingredient in an herb or in a pharmaceutical drug. It is for this reason that the USFDA, Health Canada and their equivalents in Germany, Japan, France and Great Britain use separate technologies to test pharmaceutical drugs, herbs and homoeopathic particulates (remedies).
The idea that there is no active ingredient in homoeopathic particulates is now history. Physics has prevailed, and mathematics has lost, finally. The placebo effect should no longer be used to describe how homoeopathic remedies work. They work through atomic conductivity, ionization and electrolytic dissociation. Avogadro’s hypothesis is officially debunked.
Note: This article contains intellectual property and is protected under Symptometry copyright. Any reproduction of it – in part or in full, in print or in any other medium – without the express written permission of its author or Symptometry, Inc. is unlawful. Violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.