SYMPTOMETRY

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Many journalists have been asking the founder of Symptometry pointed questions since Symptometry was created in 1992.

Incidentally, many individuals are not familiar with the answers that were given.

For this reason, the administrative staff of Symptometry decided to pick 54 questions and the founder’s answers and publish them in this medium.

Ans. – It is a field of therapeutics that promotes health by scientifically 1) addressing the needs of the cells and DNA and by 2) drawing attention to the natural and synthetic chemicals in the products we use and in the foods and beverages we consume that hurt our cells.

The emphasis is on the health of the cells, not on nutrition.

Q2. – We drink water and we all eat food. How come the nutrients we are consuming and the water we are drinking are not getting into our cells?

Ans. – This is the problem that the current fields of therapeutics are finding it extremely difficult to solve. Symptometry has the solution.

About 75 trillion cells make up the human body. Every nerve cell, bone cell, muscle cell, skin cell, etc. has an outer cell membrane. Blockages are in the cells and also, they are always covering the outer membrane of many cells.

If these blockages are not removed, how will water and nutrients get into each cell? Also, how will waste flow out of each cell? This is the problem that must be solved at the cellular level.

It is only when 1) the plight of the cell is studied in this totally different manner 2) steps are taken to remove the blockages from their outer membrane, and 3) each cell is properly nourished that all our cells will function optimally.

No disease will occur when our cells are functioning optimally. Cell nourishment is the most efficient way to cure and to prevent diseases.

As you can see, Symptometry is bringing a totally new perspective to healthcare by addressing the needs of the cells and DNA.

Q3 – Are there other reasons for founding Symptometry?

Ans. – Yes, there are. I also founded Symptometry because, when it comes to health, there is a missing link that keeps scientific disciplines in their fragmented or compartmentalized state.

Nutrition, genetics, anatomy, physiology, food science, nutritional science, biochemistry, quantum physics, microbiology, general biology, cell biology, etc. are being studied in total isolation.

Somebody has to apply all these sciences to health.

Also, somebody has to bring together and weave the strands of these sciences into a tapestry. It is in this tapestry where lays the link that connects all the sciences to health.

Symptometry is a connecting tapestry that emphasizes connections among the sciences and among the different therapeutic fields, interconnectedness and interdependence among body parts and organs, and interdependence involving humans and the environment.

 The root of diseases and symptoms is found in interconnectedness, not in fragmentation. It is interconnectedness that leads us to the cell and to DNA, the focus of symptometric treatment.

Q4.  – What is the right information or the total package on health that a health-conscious person is not getting?

Ans. - Know yourself, know your environment, reassess your relationships and maintain the good ones; know the natural and synthetic chemicals in the food you are eating, the chemicals in the beverage you are consuming, the chemicals in the products you are using and the contents of the water you are drinking.

More importantly, your health is your personal responsibility and not that of the government, and you must know what you should do in order to stay optimally healthy 365 or 366 days a year.

Finally, know how to transform what is toxic into what is safe for your cells. This is the total package on health.

Q5. – What makes you think that you are right and physicians, naturopaths, osteopaths, etc. are wrong?

Ans. – Please, don’t misquote me. I have never said they are wrong. They also have a role to play in the healthcare industry. Symptometry is providing the missing link and it is removing blockages from the cells.

Since antiquity, the plight of the cells has never been addressed. Now, it is being addressed thanks to Symptometry.

Knowledge evolves. Don’t freeze it and create the illusion that therapeutics cannot be improved. It can be improved and Symptometry is improving it.

Those who don’t have the missing link can now rely on Symptometry that has it.

Q6. – Are you not an extreme perfectionist when it comes to health?

Ans. – No, I am not. I am a result-oriented pragmatist and realist.

Look at me; look at my wife, our four adult children and our granddaughter? We are the picture-perfect posters of radiant health on the seven fronts.

Lead by example. Cure diseases and restore health to show that you are a person of your word.

I have not had a headache, pain, swelling, acne, skin discoloration, high blood pressure, low blood pressure, high cholesterol, bad breath, sleeping problem, stiffness, low energy, dry lips, dry skin, dry eyes, etc. since 1992.

What does this tell you? It tells you that there is a secret to health.

Have this secret and you will have a long life in a very healthy body.

Q7. – Since you talk about the atom, the cell and so on, I am under the impression that Symptometry is not new after all. Is it?

Ans. – The name Symptometry is new but the concepts that underpin Symptometry date back to antiquity. They were dumped and forgotten hoping that nobody would find them.

Symptometry found them, brought them back and it is now using them brilliantly.

The atom, which is often talked about in Symptometry, dates back to Democritus, 340 Before Christ.

Before the atom, there were forces that produced the wind, forces that made the cells to divide, forces that combined amino acids to produce DNA, and so on.

Before the forces, there was energy and all its tangents: light, magnetism, radiation, temperature, vibrations, frequency, wavelength, heat, temperature, electricity, colors, and the electromagnetic field.

Energy and its tangents affect health in one way or another. Why not discuss them? Why not show the connection between the foods that siphon off energy from our cells and chronic fatigue?

As you can see, Symptometry is taking mankind to the uppermost limit of creation and knowledge where lay all the answers to our health problems.

We, in Symptometry, are just doing things differently so that our cells and our DNA are properly nourished.

Q8.  - Has the FDA approved Symptometry?

Ans. – Approving a field of therapeutics is not under the purview of the FDA.

The FDA reviews and sets out guidelines for approving drugs, dietary supplements, foods, surgical equipments and cosmetics. An Act of Congress clearly defines these responsibilities.

The FDA does not review and approve concepts.

Q9.   - Has the FDA approved or does it regulate the therapeutic products that Symptometry prescribes?

Ans. – Yes, in 1938, the FDA approved the particulates that Symptometry prescribes.

Then, in 1962, it approved and it started regulating the dietary supplements that are part of the treatment package that Symptometry offers.

We don’t produce anything that will compel the FDA to step in and regulate our products.

We know the companies that are producing the particulates and the best molecules that are within the FDA guidelines. It is these products that we prescribe.

Q10.   – Are the particulates that Symptometry prescribes safe?

Ans. - Yes, they are very safe. Since 1788 (over 200 years), nobody ever suffered a stroke or died after taking these particulates, which homoeopathy, for lack of a better word, calls remedies.

Also, since the FDA approved these particulates for use in the United States in 1938 (over 70 years), it never received one complaint that was related to their prescription.

Also, the FDA has never recalled one particulate in over 70 years.

This is the most impressive and outstanding record of product safety ever recorded in the history of mankind. Pharmaceuticals don’t have such a clean record.

Q11.   – If the FDA does not regulate Symptometry who does?

Ans.   – The Board of Symptometry and the Grand Council of Symptometric Therapeutics regulate Symptometry by ensuring that whatever a symptometrist does is ethical, legal and respectful of human life, dignity and decency.

This is why a symptometrist, regardless of the country in which s/he is practicing, is licensed for only one year, from December to December.

The review board evaluates every symptometrist’s re-licensing application in December. Renewal is neither guaranteed nor automatic.

Q12.    –What do physicians think of Symptometry?

Ans. – What physicians think does not bother Symptometry. Let them think whatever they want, because thinking is free but if they have an issue with Symptometry, they will be reminded of a few scintillating facts.

They have their medical board and their standards, and Symptometry has its board, its Grand Council, its precepts and its standards.

Physicians have their medical school, and Symptometry has its American College of Symptometry.

They have their paradigm and code of ethics, and we have ours.

They treat symptoms with drugs or with surgery, and we ionize blockages from the cells, and hindrances from DNA.

Then, we supply raw materials to enable a person to produce blood and body essentials. They don’t.

We use the subatomic particles of isotope-intact natural molecules for treatment. They use complete man-made molecules with manipulated isotopes.

We do nurturing to properly nourish the cells with positive impulses. They don’t do nurturing. They prescribe pharmaceutical drugs.

It is obvious from the above that Symptometry is in a totally different league. This is why we don’t have the authority to evaluate allopathic medicine and allopathic medicine does not have the authority to evaluate Symptometry.

How in the world can you evaluate or control what you don’t know anything about?

Q13. – Is Symptometry taking business away from physicians?

Ans. – No, it is not. Physicians don’t have a territory. They do what they are trained to do and we do what we are trained to do: root cause therapeutics.

Q14.  – Is Symptometry alternative medicine?

Ans. – No, it is not. Allopathic medicine is the art of treating symptoms with surgery or with pharmaceutical drugs regardless of the root of the problem.

Alternative medicine is a different way of treating a symptom without using pharmaceutical drugs. This means laboratory-made vitamins, homoeopathic remedies, herbs, needles, water, energy; magnets, meditation, etc. can be used to treat a person.

Symptometry is therapeutic science that investigates the root of a disease or the root of a symptom before it addresses the needs of the cell, the unit of life.

The emphasis on investigation before treatment at the cellular level is what differentiates Symptometry from medicine and from all the fields of alternative medicine.

Q15.   – How can you investigate something that is at the cellular level if you don’t use a microscope?

Ans. – The adjective “cytotoxic” means a product or an agent that hurts the cell.

There is a vast databank on the chemicals in the foods we eat and in the beverages we consume that are cytotoxic.

Who built these databanks and who keeps adding new data to them? Food scientists and botanists all over the world are doing this every year.

All Symptometry is doing is, it is researching the databanks, it is using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography to deconstruct the foods and the beverages people consume, and the drugs that are prescribed.

 Then, it draws a correlation between the cytotoxins and the diseases they cause after damaging the cell.

This is how scientific Symptometry is, without using a microscope.

Q16. – Symptometry also claims that it works at the DNA level. What proof do you have to substantiate your claim?

Ans. – This is where the microscope comes in. The DNA, in tissue where an ulcer has occurred, is fragmented. The DNA, in healed tissue where it is the cells that repaired themselves, has its double helix intact.  What does this mean?

It means because the double helix is intact in the tissue that healed properly, ulcer will not recur. Ulcer will recur or the improperly healed part will itch if the cells and DNA did not participate in the healing process.

We cannot reopen tissue that has healed to find out whether DNA is intact or not. It is the absence of relapse or the absence of an itch that will give us a clue as to whether DNA was repaired or not.

Absence of a relapse is proof that Symptometry helps DNA to repair its double helix. Curing is proving.

Q17.   – How does the philosophy of Symptometry differ from that of drug medicine or allopathic medicine?

Ans.  – Why are you so fixated on physicians? Basically, according to the Symptometric philosophy, the human body is not made of drugs. It is made of 94% water and 6% nutrients.

When a person is sick, why treat h/her with what s/he is not made of? Does it make sense to fill your tank with kerosene when your car runs on gasoline?

Our philosophy differs from that of allopathic medicine because there is absolutely no logic in the drugs that physicians prescribe.

Take a drug and run it through gas chromatography. What do you see? You see synthetic chemicals that have absolutely nothing to do with human tissue.

Q18.   – What you just said about pharmaceutical drugs would it also be true of the herbs that herbalists use?

Ans. – Yes, you are right. Herbalists are not botanists.

Botanists use gas chromatography to analyze the chemical contents of plants. It is this analysis that enables them to separate the plants that are very toxic to the cells from the plants that are moderately toxic. No plant is harmless.

An herbalist who follows tradition by using plants for treatment based on their reputation will be doing a client more harm than good.

Most of the plants that are brought in from overseas will have to be fumigated at the port of entry. This is FDA regulation and federal law.

Fumigation contaminates every plant. Why use contaminated plants to prepare a decoction? Are you not going to make a sick person sicker?

There are very good herbalists out there. They don’t use imported plants. They grow their healing plants on manure soil, not on chemicalized soil. Look for these good herbalists.

Q19. – I know you wouldn’t like it but I still have to ask. What does Symptometry do that physicians are not currently able to do?

Ans. – Symptometry investigates the cause of every symptom or disease in order to pinpoint the perpetrator.

 Physicians care less who the perpetrator is. They just take their PDR (Physicians’ Desk Reference) and treat the person’s symptoms with drugs.

We do food science research. Physicians don’t do food science research.

We practice correlation diagnostics and root cause therapeutics. Physicians don’t do root cause therapeutics and correlation diagnostics. They are trained to do electro-diagnostics and some differential diagnostics.

Q20.  – What is the overall objective of Symptometry?

Ans.  – The overall objective of Symptometry is to cure and prevent every disease on this planet so that pain and suffering will no longer be part of the human fabric.

Q21.  – Is this objective not too ambitious?

Ans. – No, it is not. Think big because thinking is free. Then, desire will unleash the force that will help you to achieve your lofty goal.

Why should we have to die first before we go to heaven? Heaven is right here. We can make it happen. As a matter of fact, it is already happening in the homes of all the people whose diseases we have cured.

Q22.   – If Symptometry is the best for mankind, how come many people are now hearing about it?

Ans.   – People are now hearing about it because we had to do our homework first.

 Symptometry, which was founded in 1992, is based on nothing but the old teachings of science, specifically applied quantum physics, chemistry, anatomy and physiology.

 Scientists who rush their theory without spending time to critically examine every facet of it cannot survive intense scrutiny. We did not rush to announce our theory in 1992.

The therapeutic theory of Symptometry is very simple; emptiness does not exist in the human body.

Therefore, blood and body essentials must, at all times, be at their optimum level in all the 220 segments of the human body.

The segment in which these essentials are not at their optimum level will produce a symptom. This explains the root of every symptom.

To be honest with you, this was the final theory that helped us and continues to help us to achieve our objective: cure and prevent diseases.

The homoeopathic theory that we used failed miserably. Either there were relapses or the treatment failed outright.

The vitamin theory and the botanical supplement theory also failed to help us to cure diseases.

It was after 2 years of repeated test failures that I decided to dump homoeopathic repertorization, botanical supplements and treatment based on vitamins. Then, I turned to quantum physics.

Finally, it was quantum physics, which helped me to turn the corner. This means, if I had not studied quantum physics, Symptometry would never have seen the light of day.

Do you now see the importance of weaving the strands of several scientific disciplines to form a tapestry?

Q23.   – Yes, I do. How does a Doctor of Symptometry address the needs of the affected segment so that it stops producing a symptom?

Ans.   - It took Symptometry 14 years of relentless research to answer this question. Here is the answer.

There are chemicals in the foods we eat and in the beverages we consume that will thicken blood; that will damage our nerves and will lower the level of body essentials and blood in certain segments of our body.

We should know these chemicals so that we can find a way to soften them.

I wrote The Downside of Nutrition Part I to shed the spotlight on these dangerous chemicals that will not stop ruining our health.

After knowing these dangerous chemicals called “landmines”, we will have to use our intelligence to find the best way to soften the harmful chemicals in the foods we love.

If it is impossible to soften the harmful chemicals in certain foods, common sense demands that these foods be eaten once every two weeks or they should be left alone.

For instance, gas chromatography reveals the formidable presence of MSG (monosodium glutamate) in soybeans, sugar beets, vaccines, most oriental cuisines, chicken bouillon, beef bouillon, kale, kelp, nori, and wakame.

This scientific equipment also reveals the presence of hydrocyanic acid in all nuts, and cyanide in flaxseed, sloe, cassava, lima beans, plum, corn, pear and apricot.

A person who does not devise a technique to soften or neutralize these poisons so that the item s/he eats is safe for h/her cells will ruin h/her health.

Q24.  – How is your theory of emptiness does not exist holding so far?

Ans.   – It is holding pretty good and solid. All those who tried to poke a hole in it realized that it is applied quantum physics, applied chemistry and applied anatomy and physiology at their best.

As a matter of fact, the more people read about Symptometry the greater is their respect for it. Our goal is to help a person to heal. Curing is proving.

Q25.   – Could you elaborate on curing is proving?

Ans. – It is results that help to determine whether the theory a doctor is using is good or not. If the theory is not producing results, the doctor will have to go back to the drawing board and start all over.

We have now reached the point where people want results. 

I wish I could cure the diseases of every sick person who consults me but this is not possible in 8% of the cases. This is why I am stuck at a success rate of 92%.

To others, a success rate of 92% is excellent but in Symptometry it is not good enough. It must be 100%.

Q26.    – Why can’t it be 100%?

Ans. – It can’t be 100% because a few people are emotionally attached to beer, whisky, nuts, corn, carrot, and so on.

Telling them to discontinue these habits so that they get well is like stabbing them in the chest.

Then, there are people who don’t want to eat the foods that will help them to heal because they are vegetarians or because they are vegans. They are set in their ways.

These are the people who are preventing Symptometry from scoring a perfect 100%.

Q27.    – I am a vegetarian. Are you suggesting that being a vegetarian is a bad idea?

Ans. – There you go again. Being a vegetarian, a fruitarian or a meat eater means absolutely nothing because all of you are not eating scientifically. This is why you all have a chronic situation.

Only flesh (poultry, red meat and fish) has heme iron. Plant foods don’t have heme iron. The human body uses heme iron, not non-heme iron to produce the blood elements.

Therefore, a person who does not supply heme iron to h/her body everyday will be anemic and s/he will suffer from anemia-related ailments.

Then, the thyroid gland and the adrenal gland use tyrosine to produce their hormones. A person who does not eat the richest sources of the amino acid called phenylalanine will never have enough tyrosine in h/her body.

I am explaining why meat eaters, vegans, fruit eaters and vegetarians who don’t eat scientifically are suffering from thyroid dysfunction, adrenal insufficiency, low blood pressure, high blood pressure, heavy menstrual bleeding, hormonal problems, etc.

If a person wants to be healthy, she should eat scientifically instead of carrying the meaningless lifestyle label of “vagan, meat eater, fruitarian or vegetarian.”

A marine biologist cannot use h/her research parameters to evaluate the work of a quantum physicist; and a quantum physicist cannot use h/hers to evaluate the work of a marine biologist. They belong to two totally different scientific domains.

Do you now understand why say, a physician, a homoeopath, or a naturopath cannot evaluate Symptometry?

Q29. – Yes, I really do. The person will have to be a symptometrist first. How did you put this 21^st century marvel called Symptometry together?

Ans. – I never planned to do it and I wouldn’t call it a marvel. I just didn’t want to die. This was why I found a way to heal.

Now, 92% of those who are treated are benefiting from this innovation. This is one giant quantum leap for mankind.

Q30.   – Is Symptometry the best in the therapeutic field?

Ans.   – It is the best as far as root cause therapeutics is concerned.

However, when it comes to trauma care, emergency room physicians are the best on this planet. Give credit to who credit is due.

Hypnotherapists are also doing an excellent job; iridologists, reflexologists, acupuncturists, chiropractors, etc. also do a good job when it comes to specific issues.

It was an iridologist who diagnosed Wilson’s disease by uncovering a blue ring around the person’s iris. Physicians, with their diagnostic equipment, did not know what a blue ring around the iris meant.  Even though Symptometry is the best when it comes to root cause therapeutics, the others are also relevant. We can work together without stepping on each other’s toes.

Q31.   – Since verifiable results have demonstrated that Symptometry is the best in root cause therapeutics and people who hear about it now prefer root cause treatment, should people call Symptometry when they are sick and stop going to physicians?

Ans. – No, this is not what I will recommend. Many physicians are good at diagnosing diseases. Government grants have enabled hospitals and specialized treatment centers to purchase very sophisticated diagnostic equipments to run clinical tests.

Since a symptometrist does not have these equipments, it is recommended that a sick person go to h/her primary care physician first, for a diagnosis. It is after h/her condition has been diagnosed that s/he will be advised to give Symptometry a call.

Q32.   – What if the patient prefers root cause treatment to drug treatment or to surgery under all circumstances?

Ans.  – A symptometrist is trained to evaluate cases and to take on only those that qualify for root cause treatment.

If a person’s tissue deterioration is extensive, or h/her tumor is massive, Symptometry will recommend that surgery be done.

Our objective is to save a precious life, not to engage in the politics of greed and selfishness at the expense of the sick person.

Q33.   – what has been your biggest challenge so far?

Ans. – I don’t have a challenge. This is because I am very creative and resourceful. I know how to solve every problem that comes my way. Nothing keeps me awake at night.

Q34.   – You mean nothing bothers you?

Ans.  – To every problem there is always a solution. Every problem that you have comes with a solution.

If I can’t solve it, my wife will solve it. If both of us can’t solve a problem, our children will figure something out. We work as a team.

We built Symptometry together, from scratch, working as a team. We saved a lot of money by working in this manner.

Without their love, moral support and financial support, Symptometry would never have made it to the limelight. This harkens back to interdependence and interconnectedness, which are two dominant themes in quantum physics.

Q35.   – Can Symptometry collaborate with other healthcare professionals?

Ans. – Yes, we can. As a matter of fact, we do.

Acupuncturists, chiropractors, physicians, homoeopathic doctors, naturopaths, etc. have a role to play in the healthcare system. Life is about making choices.

For instance, naturopaths recommend water therapy. In order to treat pain, a person who combines root cause treatment with water therapy will heal faster than a person who does only water therapy or root cause therapeutics.

Then, after surgery there are sub-macromolecules that will stop pain better than pharmaceutical drugs.

One of my daughters had oral surgery. My sub-macromolecules were far more effective in stopping her pain than the painkillers that her oral surgeon gave her.

You see how an oral surgeon can team up with a symptometrist to help a person to recover faster?

Also, there are particulates that will help the nerves to find their shaft quickly and particulates that will ionize scar tissue after 4 months so that post-surgical complications do not occur.

Again, this is how a surgeon and a symptometrist can be of greater service to a sick person.

Q36.   – Does the medical community approve the research that Symptometry does?

Ans.   – Here again, the medical community has no authority whatsoever to approve what Symptometry does, and Symptometry has no authority to approve the research that allopathic scientists do.

Symptometry is not medicine and medicine is not Symptometry. The research goals and parameters of medicine are not those of Symptometry.

The purpose of medical research is to improve the efficacy of pharmaceutical drugs, improve medical services and come up with better surgical equipments.

The objective of symptometric research is to use gas and liquid chromatography to separate the good foods from the bad, the good beverages from the bad, the good cooking oils from the bad, good toothpaste from bad toothpaste, good bathing soap from bad bathing soap, etc. so that the general public is better informed and empowered to make the right choices all the time.

Symptometry is all about disease prevention; scientific enlightenment, empowerment, nurturing and root cause therapeutics.

Additionally, Symptometry uses the testing method called STM (same treatment method) whereas medical research uses the double-blind testing method.

Apples are not oranges and oranges are not apples. Compare only what are comparable.

Q37. – It is said that Symptometry is hurting the image of homoeopathy far more than it is helping it. Is it true?

Ans. – Read my books. I am always giving Dr. Samuel Hahnemann full credit for inventing succussion and for founding homoeopathy in 1788.

Without Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s homoeopathic work, I would have been dead by now because physicians could not cure my chronic diseases for 36 years.

What I personally don’t like about homoeopathic scholars and teachers is their deification of Dr. Hahnemann.

To these scholars, it is totally unprofessional to critique the founder of homoeopathy. One of them even told me “if you don’t like it here, why don’t you quit?” I quit all right.

Dr. Samuel Hahnemann is not a god that should be worshipped. Also, he is not infallible. He was a person who made serious mistakes.

For instance, he mistook a symptom for a disease. Then, he used vitalism to define a disease. To him, a person has ulcer, headache, acid reflux, high blood pressure, cancer, etc. because h/her life force is out of tune? This is Middle Age vitalistic garbage.

His treatment method was fraught with errors. It is these errors that continue to cause treatment failures in homoeopathy today. 

Earlier, I told you how the homoeopathic treatments that I provided were not effective. Why should I be stuck with what needs improvement?

Then, there was another interesting fact. Sir Isaac Newton, father of classical physics, was Dr. Hahnemann’s predecessor. Why didn’t Dr. Hahnemann study his work?

Finally, microbiological research started in early 1700, before Dr. Hahnemann was born. Why didn’t Dr. Hahnemann study microbes and Newtonian physics to bolster his work?

I am a very fair-minded critic who is also a student of therapeutic history. I study therapeutic history in order to improve what needs to be improved.

Homoeopathic scholars are stuck where they are because they have not brought themselves to think past Dr. Hahnemann. It is they who are hurting the cause and the image of homoeopathy by being so archaic and frozen in time, not me.

Q38.   – Are physicians studying Symptometry?

Ans.   - One physician is currently studying Symptometry. Others bought the exam book and they are studying to take the test. There is one fact that people must know.

Studying Symptometry requires a major paradigm shift from symptom treatment with drugs to root cause treatment where investigation and correlation diagnostics precede prescription and scientific enlightenment. This is not child’s play.

If a person is not ready for such a shift, s/he won’t last in Symptometry.

Q39.   – Will physicians earn the kind of money they are currently earning if they become symptometrists?

Ans.   – I am making good money as a symptometrist. The overwhelming majority of physicians are not rich. Most of them are struggling to make ends meet. Physicians who make good money are not prescribing drugs.

Let me state for the record that it is surgeons, radiologists, anesthesiologists and other specialists that earn more money than physicians. 

After medical school, it takes about 12 years for a physician to start making a decent amount of money.

Also, don’t forget that the more money you make, the bigger will be your income tax, insurance premium, and your financial obligations.

In Symptometry, it is better to make a decent amount of money, have a very happy family life and be always healthy than to have a ton of money and be confused and miserable.

If you want to be happy, be healthy first. Then, have a good companionship second. Don’t make a lot of money first. If you do, you will be screwed.

Q40.   – Many physicians have lost their license to practice medicine. Can they switch over to practice Symptometry?

Ans.   – Symptometry is not a shelter for physicians who have lost their medical license.

 We don’t prescribe drugs. Therefore, if physicians are ready to study Symptometry from scratch just like everybody else, they will be welcome to do so.

Then, if they pass the entrance exam and they do well at the College, they will become licensed symptometrists. There will be no special considerations.

My personal experience has taught me that people who made errors and have learned from their mistakes handle the temptations and the stresses of life better than inexperienced and naïve people. Yes, we will give them a chance to redeem themselves.

Q41.   – You must be a very compassionate person. Is my observation true?

Ans.   – I have a conscience and I value the sanctity of life and how precious every human being is.

We learn more from bad situations, from our mistakes and from defeat than from success. This is why I want to see people who have learned from their mistakes do well in life.

Q42.  – Is it your calling to save mankind?

Ans.  – I am not here to save mankind. I am just making the message of Symptometry available.

For the first time in the history of mankind, people now have a choice between root cause treatment and symptom treatment with drugs, herbs, vitamins, etc. Isn’t this wonderful?

Q43.  – I read somewhere that you were able to cure all your diseases. This is amazing. If you wouldn’t mind, what were some of the diseases you had?

Ans.  – Chronic acne, ulcers on my tongue and in my inner cheeks, which made chewing painful; chronic weight loss and inability to regain weight, feeling cold most of the time, even in summer, constant nosebleed every morning, bleeding gums, receding gums, high blood pressure, bleeding from my right or left ear, halitosis (very bad breath), over-production of phlegm, hemorrhoids, irritability, very severe depression, and very severe lower back pain.

Q44. – I was also told that your childhood was horrible. Can you tell us about your childhood?

Ans. - Physical abuse from my own father from age 6 to age 12 was unbearable.

At age 13, my mother and I came to Ghana from Gabon, a French-speaking country.

Then, they changed my name from kouassi Pierre to Peter Nartey so that I would have the proper Ghanaian identity and heritage. I didn’t know who I was anymore, just like a dog with a new name and a new owner.

Finally, even though I could not speak English, I was taken to a boarding school where English was the language of instruction and the students were speaking all kinds of Ghanaian dialects that I did not understand.

The teasing, the name calling, the improper adjustment to a new name, teachers grinning as classmates were making fun of me, bad breath, acne or boil on my face, nosebleeds, no friends, no visits from parents, etc. left me with only one excellent option: suicide.

I got a rope, I kissed the cruel world goodbye, and I left the school in search of a solid branch to hang myself. I found one but I had one problem. I could not tie a knot.

It was my headmaster (principal of the elementary school) and his wife who came and rescued me. Then, they nurtured me and they properly fed me.

I am what I am today because of them. A school headmaster and his wife who were not my parents became to me what my father was not: caring people.

These measures restored my emotional balance and my self-esteem but not my physical and metabolic health. I continued to be sick until I was 37 years old.

Q45. – I do now see why helping a person to heal means a lot to you. You do really know what suffering and being suicidal mean. If you wouldn’t mind, I will switch to a lighter note. Does Symptometry accept health insurance?

Ans.  - No. We don’t.

Q46.   – Why not?

Ans.  - Congress has not passed a law compelling every healthcare provider in the United States to accept health insurance.

We are in compliance with every federal and state law. Until Congress changes the law, people who receive symptometric treatment will continue to pay from their pocket.

Q47.  – Wouldn’t insurance give you more business?

Ans.  – We are already in business, and we are doing well without any help from the health insurance companies. This means we know how to generate our own business.

Why rely on health insurance companies and their bureaucracy to give us business? If health insurance companies give a doctor business, that doctor will be beholden to them. This takes away our independence.

Also, the number of correct insurance forms that will have to be filled, just to be paid for the service we provided is outrageous. We will have to create an office just for insurance claims.

Then, we will be paid only a percentage of our regular fee.

Finally, the insurance companies will force us to raise our fees and they will tell what to treat and what not to treat. This is totally contrary to the objective, philosophy and spirit of Symptometry.

Our fees are very reasonable and affordable, and they will remain as such.

Q48. – Who funds symptometric research?

Ans. – We accept donations but Symptometry funds its own research. This enables us to state the facts as they are without favoring anybody.

For instance, chromatography reveals that there is 30% of omega 6 in canola oil and only 8% in olive oil.

If a company that has a vested interest in olive oil funds our research, would it allow us to state in our final report that olive oil has only 8% of omega 6? No, it won’t. It would want us to change it to 32 % so that it beats canola oil.

If we went ahead and published our report without manipulating the figures, would the company in question continue to fund our research?

 There are also strings attached to government grants. All it takes is for Congress to slash the budget from which we get our funding, and we will have to scale down our projects and research, and lay people off. Right?

We don’t want this kind of instability in Symptometry. 

Q49. – Symptometry rates its success at 92%. How does it arrive at this figure?

Ans. – This is very easy. Out of 100 cases, count the number of people who healed. If 92 people healed, what is the percentage of success? The answer will be 92%, right? Those who heal partially are considered to be incomplete cases.

Q50.  – What do you consider to be partial healing?

Ans. – The objective of Symptometry is to help a person to heal 100%. To us, if one complaint has not been cleared after six months of treatment, the case is considered incomplete even though the person benefited immensely from root cause therapeutics.

Q51.  – Physicians are being sued year after year for negligence, malpractice, wrongful death, etc. Why is Symptometry immune to lawsuits?

Ans. – First, the plaintiff will have to prove that it is the symptometrist whose treatment hurt h/her. Who can prove this? Nobody can because since 1788 nobody has ever been hurt by a particulate.

It is drugs and surgery that hurt certain individuals or kill them.

A symptometrist who is frivolously sued will turn the table and sue the person who tried to defame h/her reputation. This is called slander.

It is the particulate’s spectacular record of safety that makes Symptometry immune to law suits.

Q52. – Physicians take the Hippocratic oath and pledge to do no harm. Do Symptometrists also take an oath?

Ans. – No, we don’t, because an oath is a pledge or a promise. Oftentimes, people don’t live up to their promise.

What we have is a statement of belief that is an integral part of our fabric. It reads, “As a licensed Symptometrist, I do hereby uphold the ideals of Symptometry and I will only engage in ethical, decent and legal conduct throughout my life. I will also uphold the sanctity of life, and the dignity as well as the decency of all humans. Finally, I will do everything humanly possible to help a compliant sick person to heal, thus saving every precious life under my care”.

Q53.   – You have something called the Grand Council of Symptometric Therapeutics. What does this body do exactly?

Ans. - The role of the Grand Council of Symptometric Therapeutics among other things, is to make sure that every symptometrist lives by our creed. It is the guardian of the purity of the creed of Symptometry.

Every word in our creed has meaning and value.

On the eve of the licensing examination, members of the Grand Council or their delegates will interview the future doctor on h/her readiness for the kind of lifestyle of purity that will be required of h/her.

Such a lifestyle requires no spousal or child abuse, no prostitution, no scams, no cheating, no disease, no traffic tickets, no parking tickets, etc. This requires vigilance and alertness at all times.

If they are prepared to comply, they will be allowed to clear the last hurdle by going ahead and taking the licensing examination. If they are not, they will have to find another line of work.

We are putting this position statement out there so that people know what to expect when they come to Symptometry. They must know what is our goal.

Sickness is not an option in Symptometry. Our goal is to keep living in a disease-free body for centuries.

 Methuselah lived in the same body for over 900 years. Why can’t we do likewise especially now that we have indoor plumbing in many houses, potable water in most areas, good trauma care, good hypnotherapy, etc.?

Q54.  – Are you not being too intrusive in the lives of the doctors you are training, and are you not being too demanding?

Ans.   – Symptometry is the last opportunity for the human race to vanquish pain, suffering, arrogance, bigotry, racism, ignorance and disease.

If we remain disciplined and focused, we will never miss our target.

Also, we don’t use limited knowledge in Symptometry. We always use expanded knowledge and we love it.

For millions of years, herbalists tried to vanquish pain and suffering. They couldn’t. Drug Medicine has been trying for the past 5,000 years to eradicate disease. It couldn’t, and still, it can’t.

The College’s mission is to train doctors who will help Symptometry to achieve the noble objective of transforming planet earth into paradise.

My home, the residence of a man who was repeatedly abused physically by his own father, has always been a complete paradise where love, patience and tolerance prevail. Isn’t this wonderful?

It is radiant and optimal health, and excellent relationships, not too much money that are the key to everlasting happiness.

A person who is mentally healthy and has excellent relationships will produce all kinds of conduct regulators, action activators and stoppers as well as idea connectors.

Such a person will be filled with so much love, patience and tolerance that h/her home will be paradise.

 Therefore, a doctor who is not ready to be a shining example to strangers, h/her colleagues, spouse, family members, neighbors and subordinates, and is not healthy on the seven fronts, is not worthy of being called a licensed symptometrist.

It is true that, as humans, we have character flaws and shortcomings but it is also true that with excellent brain nourishment, we can produce enough conduct regulators, action activators and stoppers and idea connectors.

It is these body essentials that will make us the best human beings on planet earth.

If every home were a paradise where love, patience and tolerance prevailed, and where everybody is healthy on the seven fronts, the streets, public transportation, the schools, the places of worship, work places as well as the public places will be safe for everybody.

Then, we will all be helping each other and be respectful of each other. Is this not paradise? Yes, it is. Symptometry is leading the way to paradise.